Addressing journalists yesterday, Kirinyaga Woman
Representative Njeri Maina clarified that the tax imposed on avocado farmers in
the Finance Act is not mandatory.
According to the legislator, the Act specifies that tax
may be imposed, a term indicating flexible implementation.
Furthermore, she explained that Acts of Parliament stating
that a law "shall" or "must" be implemented are the ones
implying mandatory implementation.
“It is not Mandatory as passed in the Act, to require that
these farmers pay tax”, stated Njeri Maina.
Earlier on it was indicated that the tax would be submitted
through the eTims platform as provided by the Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA).
According to Njeri, however, the KRA Commissioner has
the authority to decide regarding the eTims submission of tax by farmers.
However, the Woman Representative stressed that legislators
needed to engage in talks with the Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA) to chart the
way forward on the taxation of farmers.
Tigania West Member of Parliament, Kanyuithia Mutunga,
further clarified that the taxation targeted the end of the value chain and not
the farmers themselves.
He elaborated that taxation should be applied at the point
of marketing and not directly on the farmers.
The tax on farmers has sparked controversy, with farmers
rejecting the imposition of taxation.
Previously, two MPs from Murang’a County faced
uproar when they chased away KRA officers conducting a sensitization on
eTims alongside their constituents on Friday despite supporting the
controversial Finance Act.
The Kenyan DAILY POST
0 Comments