Wednesday, July 03, 2024 - A primary school head teacher sacked for ‘assault’ after tapping her toddler’s hand while he played with a bottle of hand sanitiser, has been awarded more than £100,000 as compensation.
Shelly-Ann Malabver-Goulbourne used two fingers to get her
three-year-old son’s attention while trying to stop him from playing with the
hand gel in her office at a London primary school.
Malabver-Goulbourne was the head of Northwold Primary School
in Hackney, East London.
The interaction was witnessed by the school’s safeguarding
official who filed an official complaint, leading to Ms Malabver-Goulbourne’s
suspension and the police being called.
But despite police officers deeming it ‘reasonable
chastisement’ by a parent, the 46-year-old lost her job after being found
guilty of gross misconduct.
The dismissal has now been ruled unfair by an employment
judge who awarded Ms Malabver-Goulbourne £102,328 in compensation.
The hearing was told she had been a teacher for ‘many
years’, joining the trust in 2005 and serving as head since 2017.
She was working late in her office when the incident with
her child occurred on January 17, 2022.
While packing up her things following a meeting with the
safeguarding lead, her 11-year-old daughter told her that her younger brother
had poured sanitiser on the floor.
After taking the bottle from him, Employment Judge, Julia
Jones said, the head teacher likely ‘bent down to his level to speak to him
about why he should not be playing with hand sanitiser’.
She added: ‘When she did so he turned his face away from her
and she tapped him with two fingers on the back of his hand to get his
attention so that he would look at her to hear what she was saying.’
The tribunal heard how two weeks earlier the boy put hand
sanitiser in his eye.
‘It was with the knowledge of
that earlier experience that she wanted to speak to him again to ensure that he
understood that hand sanitiser was not a toy that he should be playing with,’
the judge said.
The safeguarding lead accused her of hurting her child and compared the incident to a form of corporal punishment.
Ms Malabver-Goulbourne defended herself by claiming that her
actions were designed to get her son’s attention and not to hurt him.
The panel was told: ‘She described this action as meaning,
“Look at me when I am talking to you, focus on me and what I am saying” as he
looked away when she was talking to him.
‘[She said] that her son had not cried from her tapping the
top of his hand, he started whining because she took the bottle away from him.
She had not done it in anger or as a punishment.
‘She tapped him on the top of his hand to get his attention
to explain to him the danger of playing with hand sanitiser as she was worried
about what could happen to him. She was clear that she had not smacked him.’
In May 2022, the trust sacked Ms Malabver-Goulbourne for
gross misconduct.
‘The Trust expressly forbids any physical chastisement or
contact of any kind,’ she was told.
‘Therefore, whether a tap or otherwise, this was unnecessary
physical contact with a pupil, which constitutes an assault, and therefore a
breach of policies and statutory guidance.’
However, the judge in his ruling, said that the school’s
code of conduct does not prohibit all physical contact between pupils and
teachers and pointed out that as a parent of pupils that would be a difficult
rule for the head teacher to abide by.
0 Comments