This is a breakdown of RAILA’s petition against UHURU’s rigged win by NELSON HAVI – UHURU is going home

...state officers in particular, Cabinet Secretaries, to actively solicit for and get votes.
Manipulation of votes

IEBC is accused of ejecting Raila’s agents from polling stations in Central and Rift Valley and manipulating results from the said regions. It is stated that KIEMS was designed only to transmit results from polling stations simultaneous with images of Form 34As and not otherwise, but that was not the case after the count of votes from polling stations. 
Irregular tally, transmission and declaration


Results from 10,000 polling stations with 5 M votes were transmitted and declared without accompanying Forms 34A and are therefore, claimed to be invalid. Results from Forms 34A and 34B were not accurate and verifiable and figures therein did not add up, invalidating 7 M votes. IEBC published provisional results on its portal and National TV, without accompanying Forms 34A, in preparation of stealing the election in favour of Uhuru. 

The declaration of Uhuru as winner on 11th August, 2017 was made prematurely and without supporting 11,883 Forms 34A and 187 Forms 34B representing 3.5M votes. Rejected votes numbered 477,196 being 2.6% of votes cast and should be considered in ascertaining the Constitutional threshold of 50% plus 1. The SCOK decision of 2013 in Raila –vs- Uhuru deciding otherwise, should be re-looked. IEBC deducted 395,510 votes from Raila’s tally and added them to Uhuru’s tally. Results of Presidential Election are not accurate and verifiable. It cannot be ascertained whether Uhuru won. 

Conclusion

It is Raila’s request that the election be invalidated, a fresh election be held and election offenders prosecuted. This summary is based upon the petition filed in Court which is available to the public. The summary is based on my own views.

By Nelson Havi

Page 1 2

Leave a Comment

2012 The Kenyan DAILY POST. All Rights Reserved. - Designed by Denno